Ajayraj @ Raja – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ajai Tyagi, J.
1. Heard Sri Uttar Kumar Goswami, learned counsel Amicus Curiae for appellant and Sri Patanjali Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the state.
2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 16.11.2013 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.12, District Meerut, in Session Trial No.664 of 2010(in Case Crime No.665 of 2009) (State of U.P. Vs. Ajayraj @ Raja and others) convicting accused-appellant, under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and sentenced the accused-appellant to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.50,000/- and in case of default of payment of fine, further to undergo imprisonment for a period of one year.
3. Brief facts as culled out from the record are that P.W.1, Vinod Kalanjari, gave first information the police authority stating therein that at around 6:15 in the morning of 1.12.2009, three unknown young persons barged in his house at Kalanjari Gaon and fired indiscriminately with the intention to cause death of his younger brother Subodh Kumar, as a consequence of which his brother rec
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for wholly reliable eyewitness testimony and the prosecution's burden to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt in a murder tria....
The prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubt in criminal cases, and the evidence on record, including witness testimony and forensic reports, must be carefully anal....
A single witness's testimony can only sustain a conviction if wholly reliable; the presence of multiple hostile witnesses necessitates rigorous evidence scrutiny and adherence to the principle of par....
benefit of doubt will have to be given to the accused as it is not proved by the cogent evidence that the evidence adduced pointed to the guilt of accused and accused alone
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, and the importance of credible and consistent witness testimonies.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of scrutinizing the reliability of witness testimonies and assessing the truthfulness of prosecution evidence, especially in cases w....
The presumption of innocence is paramount in criminal trials; an acquittal should only be overturned if the prosecution proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt, which was not demonstrated in this case.
As the medical evidence does not support the manner of assault on the victim. It also lends support to the defence case, such a wound could not be possible looking to the position of the victim & per....
The requirement of corroborative eyewitness testimonies to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal convictions.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of corroborative evidence led to the appellant's acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.