K. J. THAKER, NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Alka – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Nalin Kumar Srivastava, J.)
1. Both these appeals arise out of common impugned order dated 28.3.2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court No.1, Aligarh in Sessions Trial No.67 of 2011 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted the accused-appellant, Alka, for commission of offence under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') and sentenced her to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.10,000/-.
2. Criminal Appeal No. 2275 of 2017 has been preferred by accused-appellant, Alka against her conviction whereas the Government Appeal No. 230 of 2021 has been preferred by the State against the acquittal of respondents, Sanjiv Kumar, Rajiv Kumar & Rajendra Prasad under Section 498A, 304B, 302/34 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short 'Act, 1961').
3. Heard Sri Noor Mohammad, learned counsel for accused-appellant, Alka and acquitted respondents in Government Appeal. Heard Sri Vikas Goswami, learned A.G.A. for respondent-State in Criminal Appeal and Sri Patanjali Mishra, learned A.G.A. in Governm
Pravat Chandra Mohanty v. State of Odisha
B.N. Kavatakar and Another Vs. State of Karnataka
Veeran and others Vs. State of M.P.
M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani Vs. State Of Kerala & Anr
Chandrappa Vs. State Of Karnataka
Luna Ram Vs. Bhupat Singh And Ors.
Mookkiah And Anr. Vs. State, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police, Tamil Nadu
State of Rajasthan vs. Sohan Lal and Others
State Of Karnataka Vs. Hemareddy
Girija Nandini Devi V. Bigendra Nandini Choudhary (1967) 1 SCR 93 : (AIR 1967 SC 1124)
Shivasharanappa & Ors. Vs. State Of Karnataka
State Of Punjab Vs. Madan Mohan Lal Verma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.