IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, Vikas Budhwar, JJ.
Anand Bihari - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 15873 of 2021
Decided On : 09-11-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Indian Medical Council Act 1956 - Section 33 - Medical Council of India Minimum Qualification for Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998 - Writ petition has been filed for relief - Held, Court find that there is unexplained delay of approximately 4 years in filing present writ petition - Thus, present writ petition is also barred by laches - Court finds that post of Lecturer-cum-Statistician is a specialized post in a medical fraternity and prescription of qualification is a specialized task of experts being academicians which cannot be made a subject-matter of a judicial review, particularly when there is nothing on record to show that rule making authority has no legislative competence to lay down qualification - Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri H.N. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Rishabh Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 1, Sri Nipun Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Sri Avanish Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief :
B. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the qualification prescribed by Medial Council of India now National Medical Commission (N.M.C.) by Minimum Qualification for Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998 for the post of Lecturer cum Statistician in the department of Community Medicine so far it requires the experience of 3 years as Tutor/Demonstrator/Resident/Registrar/Epidemiologist/Health Officer.
C. Issue a writ order or directions in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to say all selection proceeding including interview of the post of Lecturer Statistics advertised by U.P. Public Service Commission vide advertisement No. 4/2014-2015 dated 17.3.2015 during the pendency of the writ petition before the Hon'ble Court.
D. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
E. Award the cost of writ petition.
3. The submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner are as under :
(ii) The respondents are neither adhering to the advertisement nor to the guidelines of the Medical Council of India in connection with the selection process for the post of Lecturer in Statistics, in-as-much as the prescribed qualification requiring for three years teaching experience as Resident/Registrar/Demonstrator/Tutor contractual basis is not workable and possible hence deserves to be set aside. Although, the petitioner also possesses the experience but it was acquired by him subsequent to the advertisement. The person who possess post graduate in Statistics, cannot possess the experience of Resident/Registrar/Demonstrator/Tutor, for which the qualification prescribed by the Medical Council of India is M.B.B.S. Therefore, a candidate cannot possess both the qualifications, namely, M.Sc. (Statistics) and M.B.B.S. The persons who have been short listed, do not possess the required qualification, as provided in the guidelines of the Medical Council of India and the advertisement, read with the qualification letter/impugned order dated 13.12.2017. Only the qualification as prescribed by the Medical Council of India can be made applicable for selection on the post of Lecturer (Statistics). Therefore, the persons short-listed and called for interview, cannot be selected in-as-much as they do not possess the required qualification, prescribed by Medical Council of India.
4. Sri Nipun Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 submits that interview has finally taken place
Sanjay Kumar Manjul v. U.P.S.C.
Maharashtra Public Service Commission v. Sandeep Shriram Warade
Deepak Singh and others v. State of U.P. and others
Asheesh Kumar v. State of U.P. and others
Malik Mazhar Sultan and another v. U.P. Public Service Commission and others
P.S. Sadasivaswamy v. State of Tamil Nadu
Point of law: A criterion which has the effect of denying a candidate his right to be considered for the post on the principle that he is having higher qualification than prescribed cannot be rationa....
THE CUT-OFF DATE FOR ACQUIRING THE ELIGIBILITY QUALIFICATIONS FOR A POST IS THE DATE OF NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE CONCERNED RECRUITING AGENCY.
The judgment emphasizes the significance of possessing the minimum educational qualification for appointment on a government post and upholds the binding nature of Regulations framed by the Medical C....
Point of Law : Appointment has to be made strictly as per terms of the advertisement and in case, the candidates who did not possess the qualification as mentioned in the advertisement were permitted....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.