PANKAJ BHATIA
Rashmi Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Bhatia, J.
Heard Sri Yogeshwar Sharan Srivastava, the counsel for the petitioner, Sri Saharsh Srivastava, the counsel for the respondents 1 and 2, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava the counsel fro the respondent No. 3 and Sri Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, the counsel for the respondent No. 4.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 11.4.2019 (Annexure 1) as well as the order dated 22.3.2022 passed by the respondent No. 2, as contained in Annexure 15.
3. The facts in brief giving rise to the petition are as under :
The petitioner whose name as recorded in the educational records is Rajni Shrivastava and she wanted to change her name to Rashmi Srivastava and, as such, took steps for getting the same intent published in the newspapers. The publication was carried out in the newspaper 'Dainik Jagran' and 'Hindustan Times' as well as in the Gazette of India. In pursuance to the said publications, the petitioner desirous of changing the name in the school records, moved an application. In the High School Examination, the name of the petitioner was recorded as Rajni Shrivastava, she took the examination in the year 2009 and thereafter completed her interm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.