Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ARINDAM SINHA, AVNISH SAXENA
Muhammad Sahil – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner changed name from kamil khan to muhammad sahil. (Para 1 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner argues right to change name is a fundamental right. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. challenge to regulations on name change in educational certificates. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 4. previous judgments influence current case regarding name change. (Para 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 5. court distinguishes between correction of records and change of name. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. change of name does not retroactively alter examination records. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. writ petition dismissed; case lacks merit. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
Arindam Sinha, J.
1. Mr. Shri Ram Pandey, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client obtained educational certificates in his earlier name, 'Kamil Khan'. He has since, by following prescribed schedule, changed his name to 'Muhammad Sahil'. There has been gazette notification and presently his client is known by latter name.
2. His client applied for change of name in his educational certificates. By impugned letter dated 16th December, 2024, passed by the District Inspector of Schools (DI), his application was rejected. He relies on view taken by a learned single Judge of this Court o
The right to change one's name is a fundamental right, but such changes do not retroactively alter educational records reflecting past identities.
The right to change one's name is recognized as a fundamental right, but requires a civil court declaration and adherence to statutory regulations.
The right to change one's name or date of birth in certificates is fundamental to identity, and restrictions imposed by CBSE's Byelaws are unconstitutional if they prevent legitimate corrections post....
The right to change one's name is subject to reasonable regulations, requiring prior court declaration for validity, which was not fulfilled in this case.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that educational boards should consider applications for change or correction of particulars in certificates based on public documents and, in c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Examination Bye-Laws of CBSE are not of statutory nature, and a strict and restrictive approach in matters involving correction or change ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
