JUDGMENT :

Prakash Padia, J.

Today when the matter is taken up, Sri S.K. Pandey Advocate alongwith Sri S.N. Pandey, Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Reetesh Kumar Uttam alongwith impleadment application for him impleadment as respondent No. 5 in the petition.

The impleadment application is supported by an affidavit. Cause shown is sufficient.

The impleadment application is allowed.

Learned counsel for the applicants is permitted to implead Reetesh Kumar Uttam as respondent No. 5 in the petition during the course of the day.

Order on the Petition :

2. Heard Sri Ram Kishore Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3-State, Sri Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4-Gaon Sabha and Sri S.K. Pandey Advocate alongwith Sri S.N. Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No. 5

3. By the impugned order dated 22.1.2021 passed by the respondent No. 3-Tehsildar (Judicial)/Assistant Collector 1st Class, Tehsil-Narwal, District-Kanpur Nagar rendered in proceedings registered as Suit No. 03062 of 2019, Computerized Suit No. T201903410403062 (State of U.P. v. Raje Lal) under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006