SAMEER JAIN
Madan Mohan Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri B.B. Jauhari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the U.P. Power Corporation (opposite party no.3) and Sri Ravi Kant Kushwaha, learned AGA for the State.
2. By way of present application, applicant made a prayer to quash the charge-sheet no. 404 of 2003 dated 01.12.2003 arising out of Case Crime No. 376 of 2003 and proceedings of Case No. 5276 of 2004, under Section 39/49B Electricity Act, Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Shahjahanpur pending in the court of ACJM-I Shahjahanpur.
3. The FIR of the present case was lodged against the applicant on 15.10.2003 under Section 39/49 Electricity Act at Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Shahjahanpur vide Case Crime No. 376 of 2003.
4. As per allegation applicant committed theft of electricity. After registration of the FIR, investigation was commenced and after investigation charge-sheet was submitted against the applicant on 01.12.2003. After submission of charge-sheet, court concerned on 22.01.2004 took the cognizance and issued summons to the applicant. Applicant appeared before the court concerned through counsel on 20.02.2006 and applicant was regularly appearing thro
Abdul Rehman Antulay Vs. R.S. Naik (1992) 1 SCC 225
Bihar State Electricity Board and another Vs. Nand Kishore Tamakhuwala
Commissioner of Income Tax Madras Vs. Shivakami Company Private Limited
Hussainara Khatoon and others Vs. Home Secretary State of Bihar
Mahipal and another Vs. State of U.P.
P. Ramachandra Rao Vs. State of Karnataka (2002) 4 SCC 578
Pankaj Kumar Vs. State of Maharashtra and another (2008) 16 SCC 117
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.