N. S. SHEKHAWAT
Hero Cycles Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.S. Shekhawat, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to issue directions to the trial Court to decide the application for discharge filed by Lakshkant in a case bearing CHI No. 69412 of 2022, arising out of the FIR No. 212 dated 10.08.2022 registered under Sections 408, 420 IPC (Sections 120-B, 465, 467, 468 and 471 IPC added later on) at Police Station Division No. 6 Ludhiana (Annexure P-2). A further prayer has also been made to issue directions to the trial Court to conclude the trial in a time bound manner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that initially a complaint was moved against the accused with the allegations that they had defrauded the Company by siphoning off the funds and had caused unlawful loss to the Company. It was also alleged that unauthorized transactions had been made by transferring the funds of the Company to the personal bank account of the accused as well as their family members. Ultimately, FIR No. 212 dated 10.08.2022 Police Station Division No. 6, Ludhiana, was registered against the accused/respondents in the present case. During the cour
Abdul Rehman Antulay v. R.S. Nayak
Hussainara Khatoon (1) v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar
Hussainara Khatoon (1) v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar
Hussainara Khatoon and others v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, Govt. of Bihar
Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, Patna
Kadra Pahadia v. State of Bihar
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, encompassing all stages of criminal proceedings and essential to prevent undue incarceration.
The right to a speedy trial is fundamental under Article 21, emphasizing the need for courts to avoid undue delays and not show leniency towards accused in serious crimes.
: While speedy trial is a fundamental right of every accused but then it is not possible to lay down any hard and fast rule that delay in holding trial would always result in quashing of criminal pro....
Inordinate delay in POCSO trial constitutes material change for successive bail application, overriding offence gravity; speedy trial right under Article 21 mandates release from prolonged undertrial....
The right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution is fundamental, and inordinate delays in criminal proceedings can lead to quashing of the prosecution.
Inordinate trial delay due to prosecution's witness production failure entitles accused to bail despite serious offences, as speedy trial right under Article 21 overrides gravity where detention prol....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.