SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 217

PANKAJ BHATIA
Lari Almira House – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Aloke Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

1. Both the writ petitions are common in terms of the content and relate to the same assessee although for different years, as such, the same are being decided by means of this common order. For the sake of brevity, the facts of Writ Tax No.1570 of 2022 are being referred to.

2. Both the writ petitions have been filed challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 passed in exercise of the power under Section 74 of the U.P. G.S.T. Act against the petitioner as well as the order dated 30.09.2022 passed by the first appellate authority whereby the appeal was dismissed as beyond limitation.

3. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the appellate authority has erred in dismissing the delay condonation application, however he argues that in the event, this Court finds that the appellate court had rightly dismissed the application for extension of period of limitation, this Court should hear the matter in respect of challenge to the order dated 24.01.2022 on the grounds which are available for challenge of a quasi judicial order in exercise of the power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, more so as the doctrine of merger would not apply as the appeal has be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top