Radhika Constructions through its Proprietor Mr. Rakesh Tiwari vs State Of U. P. Thru. Secy Deptt. Of Geology And Mines Lko.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 240

ALOK MATHUR
Radhika Constructions through its Proprietor Mr. Rakesh Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Secy Deptt. Of Geology And Mines Lko. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shishir Chandra
For the Respondent: Mr. Tushar Verma

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Shishir Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Rakesh Bajpai, learned Standing counsel, Sri Tushar Verma, Special Counsel and Sri Ramesh Kumar Singh, Additional Advocate General for the respondents.

2. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.3.2022 passed by the State Government thereby rejecting the revision preferred by the petitioner against the cancellation of mining lease vide order dated 26.4.2021 passed by District Magistrate, Banda.

FACTS OF THE CASE :

3. The facts in brief necessary for adjudication of the present case are that the petitioner in response to an e-tender/e-auction for mining participated in the auction and his bid was adjudged to be the highest and lease deed was executed in favor of the petitioner on 6.6.2020 for the period from 6.6.2020 to 5.6.2025. After execution of the mining lease the petitioner started mining operations but suddenly the One Time Password (O.T.P.) was stopped by the District Magistrate, Banda on 19.3.2021. Subsequently, it is stated that an inspe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(All) 240

ALOK MATHURRadhika Constructions through its Proprietor Mr. Rakesh Tiwari – AppellantVersusState Of U. P. Thru. Secy Deptt. Of Geology And Mines Lko. – Respondent

Cases Referred (10)

ALOK MATHUR
Radhika Constructions through its Proprietor Mr. Rakesh Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Secy Deptt. Of Geology And Mines Lko. – Respondent