Back
MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Subhash Chand Mukesh Chand, Through The Partner Smt. Kamlesh Bhadana, W/o. Shri Atar Singh Bhadana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Although, as per order of this Court dated 1.9.2022, the matter was to be heard on stay application; but, on the request of the learned counsels for the respective parties, the writ petition itself was heard on its merit at this stage.
2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing and setting aside the enquiry report dated 20.2.2020, enquiry report dated 8-9.4.2021, the show cause notice dated 22.6.2020, the orders dated 11.8.2020, 28.12.2021 and 30.12.2021 with a direction to the respondents to immediately restore the mining operation and business of the petitioner by issuing e-ravanna and refrain them from creating any hindrance or obstruction in the mining operation.
3. The relevant facts in brief as emerge from the memo of writ petition are that the petitioner is a partnership firm having in its favour a mining lease no.03/1993, Village Bhonda Gaon, Jagjeevanpur, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur which, initially was issued for mineral Silica sand and later on, mineral masonry stone was also added therein. Validity of the mining lease is upto 9.6.2047 and the petitioner has environment clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forest for the mining activities
The court emphasized the importance of providing a copy of inspection reports and an opportunity of hearing before raising a demand against a party.
Rule 58 of Rules of 1963 provides that in consequence of non -payment of royalty or other dues same can be recovered by respondents only after service of notice to lessee, to pay within thirty days o....
Point of Law : Discriminatory nature in which impugned order of punishment has been passed and, as such, the action of the administrative authority cannot be sustained.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of observing the principles of natural justice in administrative decisions, and the requirement for authorities to consider relevant....
For the purpose of Rule 35-A, if the Government feels that the orders passed by the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, on 16.10.2018 were not in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the D....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
