SUNITA AGARWAL, MANJIVE SHUKLA
Sabita Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUNITA AGARWAL, J.
1. Heard Sri Raj Narayan Tiwari learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Ambarish Shukla learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondent. Shri Alok Mishra, learned Advocate has received notices on behalf of the respondent-NOIDA.
2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners herein, who are heirs and legal representatives of Raghunath Rai Sharma son of Sri Munshiram Sharma, resident of 85 Model New Colony, Filmistan, New Delhi, the original tenure holder of Khasra No. 39M. area 0-14-0 Bigha situated in revenue Village Gejha Tilpatabad, Pargana and Tehsil Dadari, District Gautam Budh Nagar, the acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 vide notifications dated 13.1.1995 and 21.9.1995 under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894; respectively, seek the following relief:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.