RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Jai Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
C.M. Application No. 1 of 2022:
1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the review application. The application is supported by an affidavit, in which reasons for delay have been explained sufficiently.
2. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Delay, if any, in moving review application is hereby condoned.
Order on memo of Review Application:
3. The instant application has been filed seeking review of the judgment and order dated 29.08.2019, passed by a Division Bench of this Court consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jaspreet Singh in Writ (C) No. 13864 of 2019, with the following description of the array of parties:
VERSUS
1. State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary Housing and Urban Planning U.P.
2. Housing Commissioner, U.P. Awas Vikas Parishad
3. Executive Engineer, Lucknow
4. Tej Narayan Soni - Opposite Parties
4. No Vakalatnama has been filed with the review application and in the index, it is mentioned that “Vakalatnama already on record.” Sri. Raj Vikram Singh Advocate had filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 4 Tej Narayan Soni in Writ (C) No. 13864
Union of India vs. Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd. (2013) 8 SCC 337
T.N. Electricity Board vs. N. Raju Reddiar
Lily Thomas vs. Union of India
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos v. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius
Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.