IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SURESH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
Tajeem – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 2490 of 2022
Decided On : 20-02-2023
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section-304-B, 498A, 304B, 302, 201, 504, 506 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 374, 304, 313 – Dowry Prohibition Act – Section 4 –Evidence Act – Section 106 – Documentary Evidence – Demand of Dowry – Criminal appeal has been filed against judgment and order by Additional District Sessions Judge Sessions Trial arising out of Case – Prosecution complainant – Held, Learned trial Judge law that when discretion has been granted to learned trial Judge not arbitrarily capriciously or perversely but has been properly exercised by accepted judicial norms – Court appellant is in jail interest of justice maximum sentence U remissions sentence awarded Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act shall remain unaltered sentences shall run concurrently clear that fine clause shall remain unaltered – Appeal is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
(Suresh Kumar Gupta, J.)
1. This criminal appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order dated 14.9.2022 passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sitapur in Sessions Trial No. 809 of 2013 arising out of Case Crime No. 51 of 2013 relating to Police Station-Khairabad, District-Sitapur, whereby convicted and sentenced the appellant for the offences under section-304-B I.P.C. for fourteen years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 5,000/-and in default of payment of fine, three months additional simple imprisonment; under Section-498-A I.P.C. for three years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 2,000/-and in default of payment of fine, two months additional simple imprisonment; under Section-201 IPC for two years imprisonment with fine of Rs. 2,000/-and in default of payment of fine, two months additional simple imprisonment; and under Section-4 of Dowry Prohibition Act for one year rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1,000/-and in default of payment of fine, one month additional simple imprisonment.
2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the complainant Qamar Jahan, W/o Imamuddin is a resident of Biswan, Sitapur. The complainant had married her daughter Tarannum with Tajeem (appellant) about 18 months ago. In the marriage, the applicant had given dowry according to her status, but the accused-appellant and her mother Asiya, Aafaq and Aafaq and his wife and Sajia Bano were not happy with the dowry given and the additional dowry demand of motorcycle was being raised. On nonfulfillment of the demand, they used to harass the daughter of the complainant right from the time of her marriage and on 01.04.2013, they killed the complainant's daughter by thrashing her and hanging her with a rope around her neck and buried the dead body secretly. On getting information from others, when the complainant went to matrimonial house of her daughter and inquired about her daughter (deceased), the family members of the appellant chased the complainant away from their house by abusing her and extended threat that if you take any legal action, I will kill you too. On the basis of written report, the First Information Report was registered against the appellant and other family members in Case Crime No. 51 of 2013, under Sections 498A, 304B, 302, 201, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on 02.04.2013 at police station-Khairabad, District- Sitapur.
3. During course of investigation, on 3.4.2013 on receiving oral information from the City Magistrate, the Nayab Tehsildar Rohit Kumar Maurya reached the place of occurrence near the cemetery secretariat. The Sub-Inspector Vidyashankar Shukla of Thana Khairabad was already present there. As per the instructions of Additional District Magistrate, Sitapur and City Magistrate, the proceedings of Panchayatnama were conducted by them. An arbitrator was appointed from among the people present there and after taking the opinion of the arbitrators, S.I. Vidyashankar prepared the panchayatnama under his direction. Thereafter, the dead body was sealed and relevant police papers for postmortem were handed over to Constable Vijay Kumar Verma and Pindarlal. After preparing the relevant papers relating to postmortem, the dead body was sent for post mortem and the same was conducted by the PW-4, Dr. Rakesh Kumar, Senior Consultant on 3.4.2013 at district hospital, Sitapur and prepared post mortem report. The doctor opined that the cause of death was due to hanging. The time of death of the deceased may be about three days ago i.e. on 1.4.2013.
4. After completion of the investigation, the investigating officer submitted the charge-sheet against the appellant and other family members including the accused Sajia U/s 498A, 304B, 302, 201, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on 23.6.2013 and 25.7.2013 before the magistrate court who took cognizance and the case was committed to the court of sessions on 26.11.2013 where the case was r
Hem Chand Vs. State of Harayana (1994) 6 SCC 727
State of Travancore-Cochin v. Shanmugha Vilas Cashewnut Factory
State of Tamil Nadu v. Arooran Sugars Limited
The judgment established the need for a proximate and live link between dowry harassment and the woman's death, and emphasized the statutory presumption of dowry death under Section 113-B of the Evid....
The burden lies on the prosecution to establish the ingredients of Sec. 304-B, and once proved, the presumption under Sec. 113-B comes into play. The accused can then attempt to displace the deemed c....
The court established that dowry death under Section 304(B) IPC requires proof of harassment related to dowry demands, with the prosecution bearing the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
(1) Cruelty and dowry death – Requirements of proof beyond reasonable doubt in a criminal trial does not stand altered even after introduction of Section 498A or 304B of IPC or 113B in Evidence Act.(....
Point of Law : For offence Under Section 304-B Indian Penal Code, punishment is imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for life.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.