SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 586

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
Central Pollution Control Board – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
Writ (C) No. 23083 of 2020, Writ (C) No. 9887 of 2021, Writ (C) No. 8898, 29859 of 2022
Decided On : 23-03-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ashish Mohan Srivastava.
For the Respondents: Kamlesh Kumar Gangwar, Om Prakash Yadav.

Headnote:

Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Section 7-A - Financial convenience - Apprentice engaged - Commencement of this Scheme - Registrar of Trade Marks – Held, Court have carefully perused different contracts annexed along with writ petitions which are almost similarly worded that it was duty of contractor to supply guards to principal employers as well as contractor has duty to comply with all conditions of relevant Act and Scheme - Principal employers have power to remove guards in case of any indiscipline or subordination or to ask contractor not to send said worker or guard - There were limited powers with principal employers to remove which may satisfy test of employer-employee relationship to some extent it cannot be denied that manpower was provided by contractor who as per agreement is obligation to deposit share according - Petition Disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

1. Above referred four writ petitions having similar issues are being decided by following common judgment.

2. Petitioners in Writ Petitions No. 23083 of 2020 (Central Pollution Control Board); 9887 of 2021 (Pee Cee Cosma Sope Ltd.) and 29859 of 2022 (M/s Institute Of Mental Health And Hospital) are principal employers whereas petitioner in Writ Petition No. 8898 of 2022 (M/s Industrial Security Associates) is a contractor who has provided employees to above referred writ petitioners on contract. Principal employers are aggrieved by common judgment and order dated 13.11.2018 and order dated 30.01.2020 passed under Section 7-A of The Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Act of 1952] whereby appropriate Authority under said Act has fastened liability on petitioners being principal employers as well as on contractor also.

3. The appropriate Authority in the impugned order has referred definition of employees as provided under Section 2-F of said Act of 1952 as well as paragraph 36 (duties of employer) and paragraph 36-b (duties of contractor) of Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 [Scheme of 1952] and further held that since principal employers as well as contractor have failed to comply with the statutory provisions of said Act to deposit due, therefore, it was directed to principal employers as well as contractor to deposit their respective contributions. It was further held that principal employers have engaged workers through contractor for their administrative and financial convenience and any financial dispute between these parties will not absolve them from their respective statutory duties. For reference, above referred section and paragraphs are mentioned hereinafter:

    “Section 2

(f) “employee” means any person who is employed for wages in any kind of work, manual or otherwise, in or in connection with the work of [an establishment] and who gets his wages directly or indirectly from the employer [and includes any person:

(i) employed by or through a contractor in or in connection with the work of the establishment.

(ii) engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961), or under the standing orders of the establishment.

Paragraph 36 of Scheme of 1952

36. Duties of employers (1) Every employer shall send to the Commissioner, within fifteen days of the commencement of this Scheme, a consolidated return in such form as the Commissioner may specify of the employees required or entitled to become members of the Fund showing the [basic wage, retaining allowance (if any) and dearness allowance including the cash value of any food concession] paid to each of such employees:

Provided that if there is no employee who is required or entitled to become a member of the Fund, the employer shall send a ‘NIL’ return.

(2) Every employer shall send to the Commissioner within fifteen days of the close of each month a return:

(a) in Form 5, of the employees qualifying to become members of the Fund for the first time during the preceding month together with the declarations in Form 2 furnished by such qualifying employees.

(b) [in such form as the Commissioner may specify] of the employees leaving service of the employer during the preceding month:

Provided that if there is no employee qualifying to become a member of the Fund for the first time or there is no employee leaving service of the employer during the preceding month, the employer shall send a ‘NIL’ return.

(c) Provided further that a copy of the forms as mentioned in clauses (a) and (b) above shall be provided by the employer to concerned employees immediately after joining the service or at the time of leaving the service, as the case may be.

(3) [Omitted]

(4) Every employer shall maintain an inspection note book in such form as the Commissioner may specify, for an Inspector to record his observation on his visit to the establishment.

(5) Every employer shall maintain such acco

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top