JUDGMENT :

SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

1. Heard Sri Samarath Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Purushottam Mani Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 and 5 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos. 1 to 3.

2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following relief:

“1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order 25.10.2009 passed by the Manager of the committee of Management of the institution (annexure 29 to the writ petition).

2. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records of the case and quash the resolution dated 25.10.2009 passed by the respondent no. 4 the committee of Management of the institution.

3. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records of the case and quash the enquiry report submitted by the respondent no. 6 the Enquiry Committee.

4. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service not to interfere in the peaceful working of the petitioner as an Assistant Teacher “Tahtaniya” in Madarsa Darul Uloom Faize Mohammadi, Hathiagarh, Dis