SUREPALLI NANDA
A. Surender – Appellant
Versus
Government of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare.
2. This petition is filed by the petitioner to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent in not disposing of the petitioner’s representation in setting aside the order passed by the disciplinary authority vide proceedings Rc No.Z-V/Estt./8118/2004, dated 01.10.2010 in dismissing the petitioner from service and appellate authority in confirming the same in Agenda No.14 of the 56th Board of Governors, Meeting held on 12.09.2011 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service forthwith with all consequential benefits.
3. The case of the petitioner in brief, is as follows:
a) Petitioner had been kept under suspension vide order dt. 08.06.2004 vide Proceedings Rc.No.Prl.Estt/8118/2004 on the alleged ground that the preliminary enquiry conducted by the Deputy Secretary on 30.05.2004 found out there are financial irregularities and other administrative lapses.
b) Petitioner was reinstated into service on 14.04.2005 after 11 months withou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.