IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
Kafeel – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P and Others – Respondents
Application U/s 482 No. 3982 of 2021
Decided On : 20-03-2023
Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Section 3(1) - Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 5 and 8 - Cognizance - Quashing approval Order - First Information Report - Recovery of knife - Whether provision of gangsters act can be invoked in a given case or not - Held,Court have given our careful consideration to submission made on behalf of appellant reinforced by expressed in aforesaid two decisions - In scope of expression other legal proceeding court have confined ourselves to language of sub-section (2) of section 40 of Act before its amendment by Act and should not be understood to express any view on amended provision - On careful consideration court are in respectful agreement with view expressed decisions that wide expression other legal proceeding must be read ejusdem generis with preceding words suit and prosecution as they constitute a genus - allowed.
JUDGMENT :
KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
1. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire proceedings of CNR No. UPJB01004815/2019 (State vs. Shahnawaj alias Shanu and Others) pending before the Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court-11, Amroha including Charge-Sheet No. 01/2019 dated 11.09.2019 submitted by the Investigating Officer before the Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court-11, Amroha in Case Crime No. 0193/2019 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station Amroha City, District Jyotiba Phule Nagar, order of cognizance dated 27.09.2019 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 4, Amroha in CNR No. UPJB01004815/2019 (State vs. Shahnawaj alias Shanu and Others) as well as Non-Bailable Warrants dated 28.08.2020, 21.10.2020 and 10.12.2020 issued by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 4, Amroha against the applicant. Further prayer has also been made for quashing the approval order dated 19.03.2019 passed by the District Magistrate, Amroha upon the gang chart which has been recommended by the Superintendent of Police, Amroha on 19.03.2019 so far as it relates to the applicant.
2. Brief facts of the case are that an F.I.R. dated 13.08.2018 was lodged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 at Police Station Amroha City, District Jyotiba Phule Nagar which was registered as Case Crime No. 0492/2018. The prosecution version as contained in the First Information Report dated 13.08.2018 is being translated into English and quoted as under:
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused Shahnawaj @ Shanu has a slaughter license under Food Safety and Standard Authority of India which is on record as Annexure No. 7 to the petition.
4. It is further submitted on behalf of the applicant that from perusal of the license, it is apparent that Shahnawaj @ Shanu is a valid license holder and is a licensed butcher having a shop in the name and style of Shahnawaj Buffalo Meat Shop. As per the prosecution case, knifes were recovered from the possession of Shahnawaj @ Shanu. It is also submitted that since he is licensee butcher, therefore, the recovery of knife shown from him is nothing but a police heroic. The investigating officer has investigated the case and the statements of the witnesses were recorded which are on record as annexure No. 8. He further submits that from perusal of the statements, it is evident that there is no independent witnesses to the incident. Charge sheet in the aforesaid Crime No. 0492/2018 came to be filed on 11.10.2018 before the CJM, Amroha against the
Amar Chandra vs. Excise Collector, Tripura
Assistant Collector of Central Excise vs. Ramdev Tobacco Co. (1991) 2 SCC 119
Assistant Collector of Central Excise vs. Ramdev Tobacco Company
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 to the appellant's actions, and the court's interp....
An FIR registered under the U.P. Gangster Act without proper legal citation and after a three-year lapse is rendered illegal.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of procedural compliance and due application of mind in cases under the Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention Act, 1986), highlighting the fundamenta....
An FIR under the Gangster Act is invalid if it fails to mention the corresponding provision, violating statutory guidelines.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.