K. J. THAKER, SHIV SHANKER PRASAD
Narendra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Shiv Shanker Prasad, J.)
1. These two criminal appeals have been preferred by the accused-appellants-Raghnath, Satendra, Pappan, Narendra and Pappi challenging the judgment and order dated 25th September, 2007 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act), Meerut in Sessions Trial No. 862 of 2002 (State Vs. Narendra & Others), arising out of Case Crime No. 135 of 2002, under Sections 147, 148, 307, 302 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Jani, District-Meerut, whereby the accused-appellants, namely, Narendra and Pappi have been convicted under Sections 302, 147, 148 and 149 I.P.C., whereas accused-appellants, namely, Raghunath, Satendra and Pappan have been convicted under Sections 307, 147, 148, 149 I.P.C. and sentenced (i) the accused-appellants, namely, Narendra and Pappi to undergo life imprisonment under Section 302 read with Section 149 I.P.C. with fine of Rs. 10,000/ and further to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment under Sections 147 and 148 I.P.C.; (ii) accused-appellants namely, Raghunath, Satendra and Pappan to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment under Sections 307 read with Section 149 I.P.C. with fine of Rs.5,000/-and further to undergo one year rigorous impr
Arjun & Another etc. etc. Vs. State of Chhatishgarh reported in 2017 0 Supreme(SC) 152
Ram Kumar Madhusudan Pathak vs. State of Gujurat
Arulvelu & Anr. Vs. State Rep. By the Public Prosecutor & Anr.
Ram Nath Nonia vs. State of Bihar reported in 1999 0 Supreme (Pat) 778
Surinder Kumar Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh
Arumugam Vs. State, Represented by Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.