SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Vibha Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Saurabh Srivastava, J.)
1. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Satyendra Kumar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following relief:-
II. Issue, a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondent authorities to delete punishment of withholding the integrity into service records of the Petition and further consider for promotion if any proposed."
3. It is the case of the petitioner that entry of withholding the integrity has been awarded in the Annual Confidential Report of the petitioner by the Reporting Authority vide order dated 20.01.2021 while the petitioner was rendering her services under the capacity of Inspector in Kushi Nagar and the same has been communicated well withi
The assessment of an employee's performance should be based on periodic evaluations and should not be unduly influenced by past assessments or disciplinary proceedings.
Departmental punishments must not violate principles of proportionality and reasonable limitation periods.
The court upheld the administrative body's discretion in performance assessment despite absence of direct observation, emphasizing the need for timely self-appraisal submissions.
Adverse entries relating to specific incidents should ordinarily not find a place in ACR, unless in the course of departmental proceedings, a specific punishment such as censure has been awarded on t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.