IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTHA VARMA, MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, JJ.
Krishna Kumar And Others - Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 8093 of 2008
Decided On : 25-05-2023
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 300, 302 and 323 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313 - Offence of Murder - Appeal has been filed challenging judgment order passed by learned Additional Sessions appellants had been awarded life imprisonment Sessions Trial arising out of Case Crime - Held, Learned Senior Counsel appellants learned question - Court definitely view appellants are innocent persons who never had any criminal record also on bail by this Court hold that appellants be fined treated as compensation money for parents of deceased amount is deposited by appellants in State Treasury within entire amount be passed parents of deceased as compensation - Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT :
(Manish Kumar Nigam, J.)
1. This appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 22.11.2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Varanasi by which the appellants Krishna Kumar, Hirawati and Lalman had been awarded life imprisonment in Sessions Trial No.291 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No.167 of 2000 under sections 147, 148, 302, 323 and 149 of Indian Penal Code and the appellant-Ram Achal had been awarded life imprisonment in Sessions Trial No.291-A of 2002 arising out of Case Crime No.167 of 2000 under sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 323 of Indian Penal Code.
2. Upon an incident having taken place on 15.9.2000 at around 4.00 PM, the first informant namely Dinesh Kumar Yadav lodged a First Information Report on the very same day at around 23.05 PM.
3. As per the prosecution case, which can be gleaned out from the First Information Report, the first informant, aggrieved by the death of his brother Ramesh, had lodged the First Information Report. The First Information Report had stated that Shiv Kumar Yadav son of Lalman Yadav was taunting his sister Saroja and upon hearing the taunt, Dinesh Kumar-the first informant and Ramesh-the deceased, ran up to Shiv Kumar Yadav where his mother Smt. Hirawati was also there and they asked Shiv Kumar Yadav and Hirawati (the mother) as to why they were taunting. It is the further case of first informant that as a result of their questioning as to why the taunting was being made, the male members of the family of Shiv Kumar namely Lalman Yadav, Kamlesh Yadav, Krishna Imar Yadav and Ram Achal Yadav came there with lathis in their hands. Hirawati the mother of the accused who herself was made an accused in the FIR, was having a Hasiya in her hands. It has further been stated in the FIR that the deceased Ramesh and the first informant Dinesh Kumar were beaten with lathis and Hasiya and because of the beating, Ramesh fell on the ground and became unconscious. It has also been stated that even Dinesh Kumar (the first informant) was given a beating. Thereafter Dinesh along with his mother and father took Ramesh in an auto-rickshaw to the Government Hospital where the doctors at Government Hospital referred Ramesh to Kabir Chaura Hospital and since Kabir Chaura Hospital was also unable to treat Ramesh, it referred Ramesh to BHU for further treatment where at 8.40 PM, it has been alleged, Ramesh died and, therefore, the First Information Report was lodged. The lodging of the FIR resulted in Case Crime No.167 of 2000 and thereafter investigation had followed.
4. Upon the investigation having been done, charges were framed and were submitted to the Sessions Court which after framing charges tried the accused Krishna Kumar, Hirawati and Lalman in Sessions Trial No.291 of 2002 and Ram Achal in Sessions Trial No.291-A of 2002. Both the Sessions Trials were tried together and when by the judgment and order dated 21.11.2008 the accused were found guilty under sections 147 and 302 read with section 149 IPC and section 323 read with section 149 IPC, the instant appeal has been filed by the accused Krishna Kumar, Smt. Hirawati, Lalman and Ram Achal.
5. Two accused namely Shiv Kumar and Kamlesh Kumar were declared juvenile and it has been stated by learned counsel for the appellants that Juvenile Justice Board, Varanasi on 25.11.2021 had acquitted them.
6. At the trial stage, the first informant Dinesh Kumar Yadav gave his statement in chief and was also cross-examined as PW-1. Smt. Phoolpatti, the mother of the deceased and the first informant had come into the witness box as PW-2. Dr. B.K. Dubey who had examined the injuries on the body of Dinesh Kumar Yadav, was examined as PW-3. Dr. D.K. Singh, the incharge doctor of the Government Hospital, Phoolpur, Varanasi, who had examined the injuries of Ramesh (deceased) at the Government Hospital and had also examined the injuries on the body of Smt. Geeta, was examined as PW-4. Dr. R.A. Singh, Surgeon, District Hospital Jau
The court held that the accused committed culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to the absence of premeditated intent to kill amidst a sudden quarrel, justifying a conviction under Section 30....
Murder and attempt to murder – In a case of free fight between parties where both parties have sustained injuries, benefit of Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 can be extended.
The court clarified that mere participation in an assault does not equate to intent to kill, necessitating clear evidence of a common object for murder to uphold convictions under Section 302.
The judgment established the need for clear reasoning in establishing the offence of murder and emphasized the importance of analyzing the intention and circumstances of the accused's actions.
The court modified the conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to manslaughter under Section 304 Part II IPC, emphasizing lack of premeditation and specific intent due to sudden provocation.
Conviction modified - Offence of Murder - Injured witnesses P.W.1, P.W.2 and P.W.3 had received injuries of blunt object, which were caused by accused-appellants with Lathis and Dandas but injuries w....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between culpable homicide not amounting to murder and the absence of intention to kill, leading to the alteration of the conviction....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.