IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, Nand Prabha Shukla, JJ.
Kali Prasad Misra and another – Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. - 1483 of 1984
Decided On : 13-10-2023
Key Points: - (!) The IPC framework distinguishing murder (Section 300) from culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Section 304, including Part I and Part II) is explained. - (!) (!) Prosecution details and defense arguments regarding lack of premeditation and heat of passion are discussed. - (!) (!) (!) The trial court’s findings and the appellate discussion on whether the act constitutes murder or culpable homicide. - (!) (!) Numerous precedents and principles (e.g., Virsa Singh, Joseph, Pappu, Gurmail Singh, Jugut Ram, Anbazhagan) are cited to analyze intention vs. knowledge and the application of Exception 4. - (!) (!) The judgment ultimately alters conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II for the accused, with specific sentencing. - (!) (!) (!) The elements of "culpable homicide" and the tests for determining whether an act is murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder. - (!) (!) The court discusses factors for appropriate sentencing and proportionality.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of case facts and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of the case and incident (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments from the defense and prosecution (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's analysis of facts, evidence, and legal principles (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 5. legal definitions of culpable homicide and murder (Para 18 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. application of law to facts and definitions under ipc. (Para 21) |
| 7. final judgment and sentencing (Para 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT :
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.
1. Heard Shri PK Singh, learned counsel for the accused appellant No.1, Shri I.K. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Amresh Singh and Shri Saurabh Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the informant and Shri K.P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. There are two appellants in this appeal. Appellant no.2 Sheo Shanker Misra has died and the appeal qua the accused appellant no.2 Sheo Shanker Misra has been abated by order dated 30.08.2018. Thus, the appeal now survives only for accused appellant no.1 Kali Prasad Misra.
Facts:-
3. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that the informant eyewitness PW-1, Smt. Ram Adhari Devi wife of the deceased Hinch Narayan Mishra, resident of village Pure Khudi, P.S. Handiya, District Allahabad lodged a first information report (Chik No.162) on 23.5.1980 at about 05:00 a.m. with respect to an incident dated 22.05.1980 of about 06:00 p.m. being Case Crime No.186/10/1980 under Section 304 IPC alleging that her Devar Lakh Narayan Mishra and two nephews namely Kali Prasad and Sheo Sankar, both sons of Ram Lakhan came to call her husband for panchayat in the family dispute but her husband refused to go in panchayat and there upon all the aforesaid three accused persons started abusing and the accused persons Kali Prasad and Sheo Sankar beaten her deceased husband with their lathis on the pointing out of the accused Lakh Narayan Mishra to assault. Her husband fell and thereafter the accused persons fled away abusing. She took her husband and laid him in a cot at the house of the door and called Dr. Hari Vishal Singh who gave treatment but her husband died at about 10:00 p.m. When the PW-3 Mahendra Narayan Mishra, who is sister's son of the informant; came at about 02:00 a.m. in the night, she went to lodge the FIR at the police station and accordingly the FIR was registered at 05:00 a.m. on the next day, i.e. on 23.05.1980. The investigating officer came on the spot and prepared two recovery memos both dated 23.05.1980, which includes the recovery memo of taking sample of plain earth and blood stains from the spot of incident. Inquest report was prepared on 23.05.1980. In the inquest report, the Panches had opined that the deceased Hinch Narayan Mishra has died due to injuries caused on the head. The body of the deceased was sent for autopsy. As per postmortem report, following injuries were found on the body of the deceased Hinch Narayan Mishra:-
(2) Lacerated wound transversely directed, 2" x 1/2" on the middle of skull, 8" above the root of the nose.
(3) Contusion obliquely directed 2" x 1" over the scalp, 1" towards right of Injury No. 2.
(4) Depressed fractured scalp, 1,1/2" x 1" with fracture of left parietal bone which was 4" above the right ear.
(5) On the opening of ante-mortem injury No. 4, plenty of denatured blood came out.
(6) Contusion 2" x 2" over the right fore-erm.
(7) Contusion 2" x 2" over the right palm.
(8) Contusion 2" x 1, 1/2" over the outer and lower aspect of left leg, 4" above the ankle joint.”
4. The chargesheet dated 05.07.1980 was submitted by the police against all the aforesaid three accused persons under Section 304 I.P.C. The Vth Additional Session Judge, Allahabad framed the charges on 06.05.1982 under Section 302 /34 I.P.C. against all the three accused persons and in alternative under Section 304 /34 I.P.C
Ananta Kamilia vs. State of West Bengal (2020) 2 SCC 511
Anbazhagan vs. State (2023) 5 Supreme 266
Anda and others vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 1966 SC 148 : 1965 SCC Online SC 46
Baijnath vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2008) 11 SCC 738
Chamru Budhwa vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Dheerajbhai Gorakhbhai Nayak vs. State of Gujarat
Gopal Singh versus state of Uttarakhand (2013) 7 SCC 545
Gurmail Singh and others vs State of Punjab (1982) 3 SCC 185
Gurmukh Singh vs. State of Haryana
Inder Singh Bagga Singh Vs. State of Pepsu
Indrasan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Jagroop vs State of Haryana AIR 1981 SC 1552
Jameel vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2010) 12 SCC 532
Joseph vs State of Kerla 1995 SCC (Cri.)165
Jugut Ram vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2020) 9 SCC 520
Kapoor Singh Vs. State of Pepsu AIR 1956 SC 654
Khokhan alias Khokan Vishwas vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2021) 3 SCC 365
Kikar Singh Vs. state of Rajasthan
Litta Singh and another vs. State of Rajasthan (2015) 15 SCC 327
Mohd. Shakeel vs. State of A.P.
Nafe Singh vs. State of Haryana
Nandlal vs. State of Maharashtra
Pappu Vs State of M.P. (2006) 7 SCC 391
Pulicherla Nagaraju vs. State of A.P.
Rajpal and others Vs. State of Haryana (2006) 9 SCC 678
Ramkishan vs. State of Maharashtra
Rampal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2012) 8 S.C.C. 289
Randhir Singh @ Dhire vs State of Punjab AIR 1982 SC 55
Sarman and others vs. State of MP 1993 Supp2 SCC 356
Sridhar Bhuyan vs. State of Orissa
The court held that the accused committed culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to the absence of premeditated intent to kill amidst a sudden quarrel, justifying a conviction under Section 30....
The court ruled that the actions of the appellants amounted to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, reducing their conviction from Section 302 to Section 304 Part II IPC due to lack of intent.
The court clarified that the distinction between murder and culpable homicide is based on the intention or knowledge of the accused at the time of the act, and that sudden provocation can mitigate th....
The court established that the presence of intention to kill, the nature of the weapon used, and the circumstances of the quarrel are critical in determining whether an act constitutes murder or a le....
The court affirmed the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, highlighting that the accused acted with sufficient intent, despite claims of provocation, based on consistent eyewitness testimoni....
The court established that a homicide committed in a sudden fight without premeditation and without taking undue advantage can be classified as culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Excepti....
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on the presence of intention and premeditation, with the absence of these elements allowing for a conviction under Section 304 instead of S....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.