Back
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Azaj Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
National Commission For Protection Of Child Rights, (NCPCR), Thru. Its Chairperson – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Office has reported a delay of 28 days in filing the Special Appeal.
2. Having regard to the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the Special Appeal and having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the delay has sufficiently been explained.
3. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay in preferring the Special Appeal is hereby condoned.
4. Heard Sri V. K. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri M. A. Ausaf, Sri Sankalp Narain, Sri G.S. Maurya, Sri Srivats Narain, Sri Adil Hussain, Sri B. P. Tiwari and Sri Ayush Tandon for the appellants, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1-National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), Sri R. C. Tiwari, learned Counsel representing the Union of India and learned State Counsel representing the State-respondents.
5. This intra-Court appeal arises out of the proceedings drawn by the learned Single Judge in Writ-A No. 2474 of 2023 wherein two orders, namely, the order dated 17.05.2023 and the other order dated 27.03.2023 have been passed. By the order dated 17.05.2023, interventio
Interlocutory orders in Public Interest Litigations do not constitute appealable judgments unless they significantly affect the rights of a party. Procedural orders are not appealable under Chapter V....
The appointment cancellation of petitioners was upheld due to jurisdictional limitations and the conclusion of recruitment processes, emphasizing the need for compliance with statutory guidelines.
The importance of procedural technicalities in public interest litigation and the need for principles of natural justice to be followed.
“unavoidable” and “unspoken” circumstances cannot be taken shelter of to claim condonation of delay in approaching the Courts. In fact the course adopted by the State in preferring the review petitio....
The court emphasized the accountability of State-Authorities for inaction and held that the impersonal machinery of the government cannot be used as a ground for condonation of delay.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
