SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 959

IRSHAD ALI
Jitendra Kumar Tiwari, S/o. Surendra Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru Principal Secretary – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Dr. L.P. Mishra.
For the Respondent: Mahendra Pratap.

ORDER :

1. Heard Dr. L.P Misra, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Arti Bali, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Pankaj Patel, learned Additional CSC for respondent -State.

2. At the very outset, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners requested for withdrawal of prayer (a) to the writ petitions, which is being quoted as under:

    (a) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the orders dated 02.05.2009, 07.05.2009 and 22.05.2009, the true copies of which are contained as Annexure Nos.8, 9 and 10 respectively to the writ petition, if there arises any legal necessity for the same as the orders canceling the appointment have already been recalled by the State Government."

3. Accordingly, prayer (a) to the writ petitions is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. By means of Writ-A No.1330 of 2010, the petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to allow the petitioner Nos.1 to 4 to join on the post of Pharmacist, petitioner No.5 to join on the post of Stenographer, petitioner No.6

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top