Shivendra Vashishtha vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 652

IRSHAD ALI
Shivendra Vashishtha – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vishal Verma.
For the Respondents: Mahendra Pratap, Sanjay Bhasin.

JUDGMENT :

IRSHAD ALI, J.

1. Heard Sri Vishal Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional C.S.C. for the respondent-State.

2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to allow the petitioner to work on the post of Pharmacist in pursuance of appointment order dated 24.02.2009 with a direction to the respondents to issue joining letter to the petitioner with a further prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 15.07.2010 and to allow the petitioner to work on the post in the light of judgments and orders dated 16.07.2010, 22.02.2010 & 23.03.2010.

3. Brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are as under:

S. No.	Relevant Facts of the Case
(a)	An advertisement was issued on 29.08.2008 by the Director General of Medical Education and Training (for short “DGME”), Lucknow for the post of Pharmacist in Government Medical Col

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(All) 652

IRSHAD ALIShivendra Vashishtha – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

IRSHAD ALI
Shivendra Vashishtha – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent