SHIV SHANKER PRASAD
Mohit Kumar Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Nitin Kumar Agarwal, Advocate holding the brief of Ms. Kanchan Sharma, Advocate, Sri Prashant Vyas, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Vinay Saran, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Mr. Ratnesh Nandan Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State.
2. By means of the present criminal revision, the revisionist is challenging the order dated 03.11.2022 passed by Second Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar in Case Crime No. 106 of 2021, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Surajpur, District Gautam Budh Nagar, whereby the learned Magistrate has accepted the remand and issued "B" warrant as also directed the accused-revisionist to appear in jail.
FACTS AS CROPPED UP FROM THE RECORDS
3. A first information report has been lodged by the informant, namely, Devendra Bansal on 09.02.2021 at 0634 hrs. against the revisionist and 5 others, which was registered as Case Crime No.106 of 2021, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 & 120-B IPC, Police Station-Surajpur, District-Central Commissionerate Gautam Budh Nagar for the alleged incident in which n
Amar Nath & Others Vs. State of Haryana & Others s reported in 1977 0 AIR (SC) 2185
Amit Kapoor Vs. Ramesh Chander & Another reported in (2012) 9 SCC 460
Narinderjit Singh Sahni & Another Vs. Union of India reported in (2002) 2 SCC 210
Raj Kapoor & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors. [AIR 1980 SC 258 : (1980) 1 SCC 43]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.