SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Renu – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner through the present writ petition has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the revised result dated 23.08.2022 for the post of Staff Nurse/Sister Grade-II in so far as it excludes the petitioner therefrom, and order dated 16.11.2022 passed by the Secretary, Public Service Commission, U.P. Pryagaraj (hereinafter referred to as 'Commission') rejecting the representation of the petitioner dated 27.08.2022. The petitioner has further prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant appointment to the petitioner as Staff Nurse/Sister Grade-II and pay regular monthly salary on the said post.
3. The facts, in brief, are that under Advertisement No.A-4/E-1/2021 issued by the Commission notifying the selection for the post of Staff Nurse/Sister Grade-II (Male/Female), the petitioner applied for consideration in the aforesaid selection. The aforesaid selection consisted of total
Charles K. Skaria and Others Vs. Dr. C. Mathew and Others (1980) 2 SCC 752.
Dolly Chhanda Vs. Chairman JEE and Others (2005) 9 SCC 779
Food Corporation of India Vs. Rimjhim (2019) 5 SCC 793
Ram Kumar Gijroya Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Another 2016 (4) SCC 754
Rajendra Patel Vs. State of U.P. and Another 2015(8) ADJ 219
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.