JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Prashastha Puri, Advocate holding brief of Shri Nadeem Murtaza, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2.

2. The case had been heard at length on 05.07.2023. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter had been fixed for today.

3. Shri Salik Ram Yadava, learned counsel for the petitioner has been heard at length.

4. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs:

"(1). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 10.07.2013 except the payment dues passed by the respondent no.2 annexed as annexure no.1 to the writ petition.

(2). Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioner under Dying in Harness Rule at the place of her husband and pay him all consequential benefits."

5. The facts of the case are as under:-

The petitioner a widow claiming compassionate appointment is aggrieved by the order dated 10.07.2013, copy of which is annexure no.1 to the writ petition whereby the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment has been rejected. The ground o