SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1200

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI
Eti Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
Prince Tyagi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Atul Dixit.

JUDGMENT :

1. Shri Vishwakant Srivastava, Advocate, has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent, which is taken on record.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and learned Counsel for the respondent.

3. This appeal filed under Section 19(1) of Family Court Act, 1984 has arisen out of the judgement/order dated 27.07.2013 passed by Family Court in Family Dispute No.1524 of 2023 whereby the first motion of the parties under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of marriage initiated on 29.04.2023 accompanied with an application i.e. C-12 for waiver of cooling-off period was rejected. The proceedings had been instituted after a period of more than one year since when the parties lived separately and had arrived at an amicable settlement on 28.04.2023 to part ways due to irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

4. Both the parties were present before the Family Court and this fact is not disputed. The learned Family Court having regard to the statutory mandate was not impressed by the argument-built on the premise of judgment reported in 2023 Live Law (SC) 375 : Shilpa Sailesh Vs. Varun Shreenivasan for the reason that Hon'ble the Apex Court in the said judgment had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top