SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3288

LISA GILL, RITU TAGORE
Jyoti – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Naren Pratap Singh, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. Loveneet Thakur, Advocate; For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Lisa Gill, J. (Oral)

This appeal has been filed by the appellant-wife, challenging judgment and decree dated 15.12.2018, passed by the learned Family Court, Rohtak, whereby petition under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , filed by the respondent-husband has been allowed.

2. During pendency of this appeal, matter has been amicably resolved between the parties and it is decided amongst them that they shall part ways amicably. Statements of the parties to this effect was recorded on 22.11.2022. Appellant stated that she is ready and willing to accept a sum of Rs. 17,00,000/- as offered by the respondent-husband as full and final settlement of all her claims-past, present and future including permanent alimony etc. She further stated that the amount would be used for future benefit of the child born out of their wedlock. Rs. 4,00,000/- out of the said amount was deposited by the respondent in the account of the appellant in terms of the settlement on which Criminal Appeal No. 332 of 2019 filed by the appellant and Criminal Appeal No. 6617 of 2022, filed by her brother pending at Sessions Court, Rohtak, were withdrawn. It was agreed that the remaining amount of Rs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top