JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Anant Vijay, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Yogesh Kumar Saxena, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This second appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 26.04.2016 passed by District Judge, Kannauj allowing the Civil Appeal No. 29 of 2014 and decreeing the Suit No. 22 of 2012 (Jai Jai Ram vs. Smt. Anuradha), which was dismissed by the trial court by its judgment and decree dated 19.07.2014.

3. The plaintiff-respondent instituted an Original Suit No. 22 of 2012 praying for a decree of cancellation of sale deed dated 15.12.2011 executed by him in favour of the defendant-appellant regarding his bhumidhari land whereon he was recorded as owner in possession in revenue records. It was averred in the plaint that the aforesaid land was the only source of livelihood of the plaintiff who has six daughters. Five of them have been married and the defendant, who is also his daughter, called the plaintiff for treatment to her house. When he was semiconscious and not in full senses she took him to the tehsil and got the sale deed in dispute executed in her favour. When the people of the village saw him with the defendant they gave full i