MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, PRASHANT KUMAR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Larsen And Tubro Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prashant Kumar, J.
1. Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Union of India on behalf of the appellants and Sri. Swetashwa Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent-claimant.
2. The appellants (herein) came out with a tender for modernization of Jhansi Workshop of North Central Railways. The bid of the respondent (herein) was accepted and tender was awarded to them and an agreement was executed on 27.01.2011 between the parties. As per the agreement, the original date of completion was 18.07.2012 but was extended by the appellants 10 times until 30.11.2015. During the course of execution of the work, certain dispute arose amongst the parties. As per the agreement, there was an arbitration clause. To settle the dispute amongst the parties, the claimant (respondent herein) submitted an application on 04.09.2017 for appointment of Arbitral Tribunal. As per Clause 64 (3) of General Conditions of Contract (GCC), and the Arbitral Tribunal with three member was formed.
3. The Arbitral Tribunal so constituted, entered into a reference and directed the
BGS SGS SOMA JV vs. NHPC Limited
Bharat Aluminium Company Vs. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc.
Dyna Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.
Mcdermott International Inc vs Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors. (2006) 11 SCC 181
MMTC Limited v. Vedanta Limited
National Highways Authority of India v. M. Hakeem & Anr.
SSangyong Engineering and Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. v. NHAI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.