Vaibhav Jaiswal vs State Of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 1309

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 1309

SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Vaibhav Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ram Raj Pandey, Shubham Pandey
For the Respondent: Bipin Kumar Tripathi,Shubham

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Ram Raj Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Deepak Mishra, learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Ajay Singh, learned Brief Holder representing the State, Mr. Shubham, learned counsel for accused (opposite party nos. 2, 3 and 4).

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the complainant-applicant with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 26.05.2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 15, Bulandshahr in Criminal Revision No. 49 of 2023 (Vichitra Gupta and others Vs. State of U.P.) arising out of summoning order dated 29.03.2022 in Complaint Case No. 55 of 2022, under Sections 323, 325, 504, 506, 452 IPC, police station Kotwali City, district Bulandshahr.

3. Brief facts of the case, which are required to be stated are that in an incident which took place on 09.12.2021, applicant/complainant-Vaibhav Jaiswal received injuries, in respect whereof the applicant filed a criminal complaint dated 01.01.2022 in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr against opposite party nos. 2, 3 and 4. The learned Magistrate, after recording the statements of the complainant and the witnesses under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document