IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Devendra Bahadur Singh @ Devendra – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy.Home – Respondents
Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No.2177 of 2023
Decided on : 06-10-2023
Anticipatory Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant based on the old animosity between the parties, injuries sustained by both sides, and the fact that the co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail in the present case.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of causing injuries to multiple persons due to old animosity.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant based on the circumstances of the case, including the old animosity between the parties and the injuries sustained by both sides.
Issues: Anticipatory bail application in a case involving multiple injuries and old animosity between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: Granting anticipatory bail based on the circumstances of the case, including the old animosity between the parties and the injuries sustained by both sides.
Final Decision: The anticipatory bail application of the applicant was allowed with specific conditions.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Dheeraj Awasthi, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Vyas, the learned AGA-I for the State and perused the records.
2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in an FIR bearing Case Crime No. 373 of 2021, under Sections 308, 325, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Maurawan, District Unnao.
3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged on 20.08.2021 against four persons, including the applicant, alleging that because of an old animosity all the accused persons had beaten up the informant and his family members with sticks, causing injuries to four persons.
4. In the statement, the number of injured persons increased to five and all the five injured persons have been examined medically. An x-ray examination report of one injured person mentions fracture on skull.
5. It has been stated in the FIR that an FIR of the incident was lodged from the side of the applicant also on the same day, which has been registered as FIR No. 374/2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 308 IPC, against four persons, alleging that all those persons had beaten up and caused injuries to three persons on the side of the applicants.
6. A copy of the x-ray report of the applicant has been annexed with the affidavit indicating that he had suffered a fracture on his skull in the incident.
7. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the co-accused Aditya has been granted anticipatory bail by means of an order dated 18.09.2023 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2016 of 2023.
8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the incident occurred because of an old animosity between the parties; persons from both the sides received injuries in the incident and both the sides have lodged FIRs against each other and that the applicant is 50 year's old person having no criminal history and the co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail in the present case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant.
9. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Devendra Bahadur Singh @ Devendra before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid complaint case, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court:
(ii). That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
(iii). That the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
Granting anticipatory bail based on the circumstances of the case, including the old animosity between the parties and the injuries sustained by both sides.
The court has the discretion to grant anticipatory bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, and may impose conditions to ensure cooperation with the investigation and prevent tampering ....
Anticipatory bail can be granted when allegations are general and injuries are not grievous.
The court considered the absence of any overt act attributed to the applicant by the injured complainant as a key factor in granting anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Cr.P.C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.