SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 605

ATUL SREEDHARAN
Himanshu Tomar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B. S. Gour, Advocate, Lokendra Shrivastav, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Atul Sreedharan, J. - This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.54/2022 for offence punishable under section 308, 323, 294 and 34 of the I.P.C. registered a t Police Station - Rithorakala, district Morena (M.P.).

2. The allegation against hims is that he accompanied the main accused Dilip Rajawat @ Raju Rajawat and co-accused Raju Rajawat fired a gun shot which injured the complainant of the abdomen.

3. Learned Government Advocate for the respondent/State while opposing the application has read out from the FIR and 161 statement of the injured complainant that not a single whisper let alone the allegation as leveled against the applicant herein but for his presence along with main accused. The complainant does not say that the applicant herein either instigated or abetted the main accused in any manner to cause the gun shot injury on the complainant. In fact, nothing is attributed to the applicant herein and but for his presence as stated already hereinabove. Learned Government Advocate further submits that the applicant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top