ATUL SREEDHARAN
Himanshu Tomar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Atul Sreedharan, J. - This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.54/2022 for offence punishable under section 308, 323, 294 and 34 of the I.P.C. registered a t Police Station - Rithorakala, district Morena (M.P.).
2. The allegation against hims is that he accompanied the main accused Dilip Rajawat @ Raju Rajawat and co-accused Raju Rajawat fired a gun shot which injured the complainant of the abdomen.
3. Learned Government Advocate for the respondent/State while opposing the application has read out from the FIR and 161 statement of the injured complainant that not a single whisper let alone the allegation as leveled against the applicant herein but for his presence along with main accused. The complainant does not say that the applicant herein either instigated or abetted the main accused in any manner to cause the gun shot injury on the complainant. In fact, nothing is attributed to the applicant herein and but for his presence as stated already hereinabove. Learned Government Advocate further submits that the applicant
The court considered the absence of any overt act attributed to the applicant by the injured complainant as a key factor in granting anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Cr.P.C.
Granting anticipatory bail based on the circumstances of the case, including the old animosity between the parties and the injuries sustained by both sides.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, based on the circumstances of the case an....
The court reinforced that anticipatory bail can be granted conditionally based on the accused's role and risk factors, with careful consideration of all parties involved.
The grant of anticipatory bail under CrPC Section 438 is contingent upon the assessment of injury severity and the accused's background.
The court's decision to grant anticipatory bail was influenced by the absence of misuse of bail, the undertaking of the applicant, and the specific conditions imposed for the grant of anticipatory ba....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.