Back
RAJ BEER SINGH
Meera Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Raj Beer Singh, J.)
1. Supplementary counter affidavit filed by learned A.G.A. is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. This anticipatory bail application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.42A of 2006, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 120-B r/w 34 IPC and Section 13(2) Prevention of Corruption Act, P.S. Sukhpura, District Ballia with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.
4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and she has an apprehension that she may be arrested in the above-mentioned case, whereas there is no credible evidence against her. The applicant was working as Block Pramukh and as per prosecution version, an amount of Rs.15,80,660/- provided for welfare schemes was misused. It was submitted that the first information report has been lodged against several persons, including the government officials. The allegations levelled against applicant, are wholly false. There is no evidence that any amount was transferred to the account of applicant. Further, the applica
The execution of process under Section 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. against an applicant may render them not entitled to anticipatory bail, but the court may consider their bail application expeditiously based ....
The court denies anticipatory bail to the applicant due to the execution of process under Section 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. However, it provides an opportunity for the applicant to apply for bail after surre....
The court emphasized the need for concrete facts to support apprehension of arrest in deciding anticipatory bail applications.
Anticipatory bail granted with conditions for investigation despite misappropriation allegations.
The court may grant anticipatory bail based on the nature of allegations and the circumstances of the case, including the status of co-accused.
The court has the discretion to grant anticipatory bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
applicant is not entitled for anticipatory bail on the ground that applicant was not only declared proclaimed offender under Section 82 Cr.P.C. but proclamation of attachment of property was also iss....
The court reinforced that anticipatory bail deliberation should balance the seriousness of allegations with principles of justice and public safety.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
