SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1365

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, JJ.
Smt. Gunja and Another - Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. and Others - Respondents
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 12630 of 2023
Decided On : 18-10-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sujeet Nath Pandey.
For the Respondent: G.A., Indradeo.

The main legal point established was that when educational records exist to determine a minor's age, an ossification test is not necessary, and false assertions can lead to adverse consequences.

Headnote:

Juvenile Justice Act - Age Determination - Section 94

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a writ petition seeking the quashing of an FIR under Section 363 I.P.C. based on the age of the victim. The victim's age was in question, and conflicting evidence was presented regarding her date of birth.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the victim's educational records clearly indicated her date of birth, rendering the ossification test and other statements unnecessary. The court also held that the allegation in the FIR regarding the victim's minority status was established from the material on record, and thus the FIR could not be quashed.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the victim was a minor, and the relevance of the ossification test and statements under section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice Act, which outlines the process for age determination. It emphasized that when educational records exist, an ossification test is not necessary, and false assertions made by the victim led to the dismissal of the petition with costs.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and costs of Rs.5000/- were imposed on the petitioners for making false assertions.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the first informant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The instant writ petition seeks quashing of the FIR dated 14.11.2022 giving rise to Case Crime No.0486 of 2023, under Section 363 I.P.C., Police Station-Phoolpur, District-Varanasi.

3. It transpires from the record that this petition came up for admission on 10.08.2023, when an order was passed for production of the alleged victim before the CMO, Varanasi for determination of her age on the basis of ossification test. The statements under section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. were also directed to be recorded.

4. This was so ordered as it was submitted that the victim is illiterate and never received education from any institution and therefore there is no documentary proof regarding her age.

5. The ossification test report as also the statements recorded under section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. are available on record in sealed condition.

6. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the first informant annexing thereto, a certificate of the Headmaster of Primary School, Katrao, Block Badagaon, District Varanasi, which states that the victim obtained education from Class 1 to Class 5th in the said Institution and in the records maintained her date of birth is recorded as 15.11.2006.

7. Her Class 8th Mark-sheet issued from Shri Suraj Prasad Intermediate College, Varanasi has also been annexed. In this mark-sheet also her Date of Birth is recorded as 15.11.2006.

8. The issue involved in this writ petition is primarily as to whether the victim is minor or not.

9. With regard to the above, the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 comes into play and Section 94 of the said Act is being extracted below:-

    "(1) Where, it is obvious to the Committee or the Board, based on the appearance of the person brought before it under any of the provisions of this Act (other than for the purpose of giving evidence) that the said person is a child, the Committee or the Board shall record such observation stating the age of the child as nearly as may be and proceed with the inquiry under section 14 or section 36, as the case may be, without waiting for further confirmation of the age.

(2) In case, the Committee or the Board has reasonable grounds for doubt regarding whether the person brought before it is a child or not, the Committee or the Board, as the case may be, shall undertake the process of age determination, by seeking evidence by obtaining—

(i) the date of birth certificate from the school, or the matriculation or equivalent certificate from the concerned examination Board, if available; and in the absence thereof;

(ii) the birth certificate given by a corporation or a municipal authority or a panchayat;

(iii) and only in the absence of (i) and (ii) above, age shall be determined by an ossification test or any other latest medical age determination test conducted on the orders of the Committee or the Board:

Provided such age determination test conducted on the order of the Committee or the Board shall be completed within fifteen days from the date of such order.

(3) The age recorded by the Committee or the Board to be the age of person so brought before it shall, for the purpose of this Act, be deemed to be the true age of that person."

10. A perusal of Sub-section 2 of Section 94 quoted above is relevant and its perusal will show that age to be determined, on the basis of date of birth certificate from the school, or matriculation or equivalent certificate. In the absence of the above, it is to be determined on the basis of a birth certificate issued by a corporation or municipal authority or panchayat. It is only when the documents noted above are not in existence can an ossification test is to be resorted to, for determining the age of a person.

11. Since, in the case at hand, there exists and has been brought on record, the birth certificate from the school where the victim obtained education, it is clear th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top