Back
JYOTSNA SHARMA
Om Prakash @ Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Sheikh Wali-Uz Zaman, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned AGA for the State.
2. This criminal appeal has been filed by the appellants-Om Prakash @ Prakash and Naresh @ Ram Naresh challenging the order of conviction and sentence dated 08.02.2000 passed by the VIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Hardoi in ST No. 652 of 1995 whereby the appellant has been convicted under section 306 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment of 5 years.
3. A number of legal and factual points have been raised by the appellants which shall be dealt with at appropriate stages in the body of the judgment.
4. Relevant facts in nutshell are as below:-
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of clear mens rea and direct or indirect acts of incitement to establish abetment of suicide under section 306 IPC. The court empha....
For conviction under Sections 306 and 498A, clear evidence of instigation or aiding in suicide is essential; mere allegations of harassment are insufficient.
Abetment of suicide requires clear connection between accused's actions and the suicide, with established mens rea of instigation or provocation.
For a conviction under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or aiding that compels suicide, which was not established in this case.
The judgment emphasizes the requirement of unqualified clarity and conviction in proving the accused's culpability under Section 306 IPC, highlighting the necessity of mens rea and a direct link betw....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
