SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Vijay Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate/Arbitrator – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Atul Dayal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Vivek Saran, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Petitioners have preferred this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 31.07.2023 passed by the Additional District Judge/F.T.C. No.2, Muzaffar Nagar rejecting the application no.58Ga under Section 3(I)(b) of the National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act, 1956’) read with Order 11 Rule 12 of C.P.C. and application 63Ka under Section 23(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act, 1996’) in Arbitration Case No.779 of 2011.
3. The facts in brief are that land of the petitioners being Khasra No.82 admeasuring 250 square meters, village Husainpur, Bopada, Muzaffar Nagar was acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as 'NHAI') for expansion of National Highway No.58 by issuing a notification dated 28.11.2005 and 24.11.2006 under Section 3A of the Act, 1956. The competent authority notified under the Act, 1956 prepared a draft award determining the rate of compensation at Rs.770/-per square meter to be paid to the land owners whos
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.