SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1507

UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Sankatha – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.M.N. Singh, Anil Kumar Verma, Deena Nath

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Anil Srivastava, assisted by Sri Anil Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the revisionists, Sri Roshan Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State at length and perused the material available on record.

2. This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction and sentencing passed by Assistant Sessions Judge, 5th Varanasi, in S.T. No. 183 of 1989 (State Vs. Sankata and four others) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 I.P.C. and Section 25 of the Arms Act and Crl. Appeal No. 27 of 1990 (Sankatha and Four Others Vs. State) dated 17th August, 1990 by the Sessions Judge, Varanasi.

3. The learned A.S.J. convicted accused Sankatha u/s 147, 148, 307 I.P.C. and Section 25 of the Arms Act and awarded one month’s simple imprisonment u/s 147 I.P.C. three months simple imprisonment u/s 148 I.P.C. and 7 years rigorous u/s 307 I.P.C. and fine of Rs. 500/-. He also sentenced the accused Sankatha for five months of rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/-u/s 2

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top