UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Sankatha – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Anil Srivastava, assisted by Sri Anil Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the revisionists, Sri Roshan Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State at length and perused the material available on record.
2. This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction and sentencing passed by Assistant Sessions Judge, 5th Varanasi, in S.T. No. 183 of 1989 (State Vs. Sankata and four others) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 I.P.C. and Section 25 of the Arms Act and Crl. Appeal No. 27 of 1990 (Sankatha and Four Others Vs. State) dated 17th August, 1990 by the Sessions Judge, Varanasi.
3. The learned A.S.J. convicted accused Sankatha u/s 147, 148, 307 I.P.C. and Section 25 of the Arms Act and awarded one month’s simple imprisonment u/s 147 I.P.C. three months simple imprisonment u/s 148 I.P.C. and 7 years rigorous u/s 307 I.P.C. and fine of Rs. 500/-. He also sentenced the accused Sankatha for five months of rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/-u/s 2
Bhagwan Jagannath Markad Vs. State of Maharashtra
Dalbir Kaur Vs. State of Punjab (1976) 4 SCC 158
Mohd. Hashim Vs. State of U.P and others
Mukesh Vs. State for NCT of Delhi and Others, AIR 2017 SC 2161 (three Judge Bench)
Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab AIR 1965 SC 444
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.