PRAKASH SINGH
Shatrughan Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Application for Extension of Time - IA/2/2023)
1. Heard Shri Onkar Nath Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned Chief Standing Counsel assisted by Shri Praful Kumar Yadav, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, Shri Hemant Pandey, learned Standing Counsel and Shri Dhirendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State/Applicant.
2. The deponent/State by way of instituting an application dated 21.11.2023 sought prayer for extension of time, as provided in the judgment and order dated 27.09.2022.
3. While filing writ petition Matters Under Article 227 No.3726 of 2022 (Shatrughan Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and Others) the petitioner, namely, Shatrughan Yadav sought prayer for issuance of a direction to respondent/ opposite party nos.2 and 3 to conclude the survey bandobast, initiated under Section 49 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as "Code, 2006"), in respect to village-Majha Rath and Majha Durgaganj, Tehsil- Tarabganj, District-Gonda within stipulated period of time as fixed by this Court. The petitioner further submitted that the matter of survey bandobast is pending since 2020 and the gazette notification wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.