JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Anil Pratap Singh, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Indrajeet Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the Applicant/opposite parties in the writ petition and Sri S.M. Singh Royekwar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner/respondents in the present application.

2. Admittedly, the writ petition bearing Service Single No. 30782 of 2018 (Sanjeev Kumar Singh vs. State of U.P. and others) has already been decided finally on 27.5.2019 but the State opposite parties have filed the application under the title of "Application for Leave to Pass Final Order In Disciplinary Proceedings Against The Petitioner In Terms Of Directions Contained in Judgment And Order Dated 27.5.2019" on 29.7.2022.

3. For disposal of the aforesaid application it would be necessary to reproduce the final order dated 27.5.2019 herein below:

"Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The precise submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that by means of order dated 20.5.2018 the petitioner was placed under suspension and this Court vide order dated 17.11.2018 was pleased to stay the suspension order. Thereafter, vide order dated 28.2.2019 the petitioner was re