RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Sanjeev Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By means of instant criminal revision, the revisionist/accused has assailed the judgement of learned A.C.J.M., court no. 8, Ghaziabad in Criminal Case No. 75 of 2016 arising out of Case Crime no. 331 of 2013 under Sections 498-A, 323, 377 IPC and Section 4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Link Road, District Ghaziabad, the revisionist has been convicted of charge under section 498-A, 323, 377 IPC and Section 4 of D.P. Act and sentenced him to two years rigorous imprisonment and Rs. 30,000/-fine for charge under Section 498-A IPC and five years rigorous imprisonment and Rs. 20,000/-fine for charge under Section 377 IPC, six months simple imprisonment and Rs. 500/-for charge under Section 323 IPC and one year simple imprisonment and Rs. 1,500/-fine for charge under section 4 D.P. Act and sentence and fine are coupled with default stipulation; all the sentences were directed to run concurrently. 50% fine is directed to be paid as compensation to the victim/ informant.
2. The revisionist has assailed judgement of trial court in criminal appeal no. 129 of 2018 (Sanjeev Gupta vs. State of UP) whereby criminal appeal is partly allowed to the extent that conviction for charge under section 49
Dhanj Singh vs. State of Punjab
Fiona Shrikhande vs. State of Maharastra
Gannath Patnayak vs. State of Orissa
Harbans Kaur vs. State of Haryana
Independent thought vs. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 800
K. Chinnaswami Reddy vs. State of Andhar Pradesh
Khem Ram vs. State of Himanchal Pradesh
Namdev vs. State of Maharashtra (2007) 14 SCC 150
Rahul Mishra vs. State of Uttrakhand
Sucha Singh vs. State of Punjab
Suraj Singh alias Sonu Suraj Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.