UMANG SINGHAR vs STATE OF Madhya Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(MP) 1017

SANJAY DWIVEDI
UMANG SINGHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF Madhya Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Vibhor Khandelwal, Ashish Agrawal, Jayesh Gurnam.
For the Respondents: Puneet Shroti, Sanjay Agrawal, Rahul Gupta.

Table of Content
1. allegations of serious offenses in an fir require specific details to be actionable. (Para 2 , 3 , 6)
2. the nature of the marital relationship impacts definitions of sexual offenses. (Para 10 , 19 , 21)
3. the court concluded the petitioner's allegations were unfounded and quashed the fir. (Para 22 , 24)

ORDER :

1. On finding the pleadings being complete and the learned counsel for the rival parties concurred to argue the matter finally, it was thoroughly heard and order was reserved for pronouncement.

2. This petition is filed under section 482 of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE for quashing the FIR registered vide Crime No. 540/2022 at Police Station Naogaon, District Dhar on the fulcrum of a complaint made by respondent No. 2 against the petitioner for the offence punishable under sections 294, 323, 376(2)(n), 377, 498-A, 506 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE .

3. Multifarious grounds have been urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner while seeking to quash the FIR. Conversely, the learned counsel for the respondents imprecating the act of the petitioner as not less than transgression of law, vehemently urged for no interference by this Court.

4. To lift the curtain on from