MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Sanju – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Manju Rani Chauhan, J.)
1. List is revised. None appears on behalf of respondent no. 4. As per office report dated 25.10.2023, service upon respondent nos. 5 & 6 is sufficient, but no one has put in appearance on their behalf even in the revised call, as also learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 is not present. Learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
2. On 16.05.2023 following order was passed by this Court:
Present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 15.4.2023 by which recounting of votes has been ordered.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was declared winning candidate in the election of Gram Panchayat, Amdariya therefore respondent no.4 filed an election petition with a prayer for recounting of votes which is covered under section 12-C of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act. In support thereof he relief upon paragraph nos. 8, 9 an 10 of the judgment of this Court in Sushil Kumar vs. State of U.P. (2
Mahendra Pal v. Shri Ram Dass Malanger & Ors
Bhabi Vs. Sheo Govind and others : AIR 1975 SC 2117
Ghulam Mohiuddin v. Election Tribunal for Town Area Sakit : AIR 1959 All 357 : 1959 All LJ 169 (FB)
Kunwar Nripendra Bahadur Singh v. Jai Ram Verma and others : (1977) 4 SCC 153
Chandrika Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar and others : (2004) 6 SCC 331
Shyamdeo Pd. Singh v. Nawal Koshore Yadav : (2000) 8 SCC 46
Laxmi Kant Bajpai v. Haji and others : (2010) 4 SCC 81
Wapansao v. N.L. Odyuo and others : AIR 1971 SC 2123
Indrajit Barua and others etc. v. Election Commission of India and others : AIR 1986 SC 103
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.