ABDUL MOIN
Lali Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Panchayatiraj Civil Secrt. Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri H.G.S.Parihar, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Dinesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to 3 and Sri U.S.Sahai, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 5.
2. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for the following main reliefs:-
(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 03.01.2023 passed by the learned Additional District Judge Court No. 2/Special Judge E.C.Act, Sitapur in Civil Revision No. 47 of 2022 Smt. Lali Devi Vs. S.D.M.Maholi and Ors contained as Annexure No. 1 only to the extent denial of quashing the order of the re-counting to this petition in the interest of justice.
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 02.09.2022 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate Maholi/Prescribed Authority District Sitapur in Case No. 1678/2021 (Election Petition No. 19/23) Mahaveer Vs. Smt. Lali Devi and Ors U/S 12 (C) of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 contained as Annexure No. 2 to this petition in the interest of just
Arikala Narasa Reddy Vs. Venkata Ram Reddy Reddygari and Anr reported in (2014) 5 SCC 312
Baldeo Singh v. Teja Singh : AIR 1975 SC 693
Bhabhi v. Sheo Govind AIR 1975 SC 2117
Bhabhi v. Sheo Govind : 1975 SCR 202
Dr. Jagjit Singh v. Giani Kartar Singh : AIR 1966 SC 773
Jitendra Bahadur Singh v. Krishna Behari AIR 1970 SC 276
N. Narayanan v. S. Semalai : AIR 1980 SC 206
Ram Sewak Yudav v. Hussain Kamil Kidwai AIR 1964 SC 1249
Shashi Bhusan v. Prof. Balraj Madhok: AIR 1972 SC 1251
Sumitra Devi v. Shri Sheo Shanker Prasad Yadav AIR 1973 SC 215
Suresh Prasad Yedav v. Jai Prakash Misra : AIR 1975 SC 376
Uday Chand Vs. Surat Singh and Anr reported in (2009) 10 SCC 170
A recount can only be ordered when specific allegations of counting irregularities are proven with supporting evidence, prioritizing electoral integrity over secrecy.
An order for recount does not dispose of the election application finally, and the burden of proof rests on the election petitioner to establish irregularity or illegality in the original counting of....
Recounting of votes requires a prima facie case supported by cogent evidence; mere differences in vote counts do not justify recounting.
The necessity for a prima facie case to be established before ordering a recount of votes, and the requirement for adequate statement of material facts and contemporaneous evidence to support the all....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.