VIKAS BUDHWAR
Dhananjay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri H.N. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Girdhar Prasad Tripathi, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel who appears for respondents No. 1 to 5 and Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Jigar Khare, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Since affidavits have been exchanged between the parties and they do not propose to file any further affidavits thus with their consent the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage.
3. The facts of the case as worded in the writ petition are that there is an institution by the name of Mathura P.G. College, Rasra, District Ballia which is affiliated to Jannayak Chandrashekhar University, Ballia (In short respondent University) and the first statute of Mahatama Ganhi Kashi Vidyapeeth (First amendment) Statue 2011 are applicable.
4. Since the fourth respondent institution is affiliated to the respondent University thus the payment of salaries of the teaching and non teaching staff of the institution is being made under the provisions of Section 60B of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973.
5. The writ petitioner claims to be appointed as a Lecturer/Associa
Ashok Kumar Jain vs. State of U.P.
Smt. Archana Singh vs. State of U.P.
Smt. Duleshwari Devi vs. State of U.P. and others
Babulal Badriprasad Varma vs. Surat Municipal Corporation and others
ARCE Polymers Private Ltd. vs. Alphine Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd. and others
Union of India and others vs. N. Murgu Ganeshan
Dhanesh Kumar Sharma vs. State of U.P. & others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.