Back
VIKAS BUDHWAR
Jubilee Sanskrit College – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court addresses procedural discrepancies in the order by vice chancellor. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. verification of qualifications for principal appointment (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. inquiry and alleged forgery of experience certificate (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. judicial review of administrative decisions (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. arguments regarding procedural compliance and certificate validity (Para 19 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 31) |
| 6. assessment of reasoning and legal standards necessary for administrative decisions. (Para 20) |
| 7. requirement for reasons in administrative decisions (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. court's findings on legal standards for administrative orders (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 9. final decision directing a fresh order to be made by the vice chancellor (Para 48) |
JUDGMENT :
VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the second and the third respondent is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Shivendu Ojha, for the writ petitioners, Sri Shailendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel who appears for the respondent no. 1, Sri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 and 3 and Sri Ash
Quasi-judicial authorities must provide reasoned decisions when determining civil rights; failure to do so renders the decision unsustainable.
Quasi-judicial authorities must provide substantiated reasoning in their decisions to ensure fairness in civil rights matters.
It is in interest of University that all doubts regarding appointment of teachers are raised within a period of three months to have an early decision by Chancellor to give quietus to disputes in Uni....
The failure to issue a disagreement note when the disciplinary authority disagrees with the Enquiry Officer's findings constitutes a violation of natural justice, necessitating remittance for proper ....
The Selection Committee cannot alter the essential qualifications for a position once the selection process has commenced, and the Chancellor has the authority to terminate appointments that do not c....
Alternative remedies do not bar the maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226, especially in cases involving fundamental rights or jurisdictional issues.
The appointment of a candidate is invalid if they do not disclose current employment and fail to submit a mandatory no objection certificate during the selection process.
The court emphasized adherence to procedural fairness and legitimate expectations in administrative appointments, allowing reinstatement due to unjust termination based on misrepresentation and ante-....
The court upheld the validity of the petitioner's appointment as Principal, asserting no individual can claim dual permanent positions in educational administration.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
