JUDGMENT :

1. The opposite party no. 2 appeared in person and she has filed a counter affidavit. She stated that she will advance her submissions by herself, as she is not in a position to afford to pay the fee of any Advocate. The Court offered to provide the services of an Advocate at the State’s expenses but she declined the. After this, the Court proceeded to hear the submissions of Dr. Lalta Prasad Misra, the learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Anurag Verma, learned A.G.A-I for the State and Ms. Disha Kappor, the opposite party no. 2 in person, who has produced her Adhaar Card to establish her identity.

2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the applicants have sought quashing of the summoning order dated 08.11.2023 passed by the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No. 27, Lucknow and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 9780 of 2022 instituted in furtherance of Miscellaneous Case No. 325/2022, which was an application filed by the opposite party no. 2 under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C (Disha Tandon Vs. Ayush Tandon and others) under Sections 498-A, 325, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, Hazratga