SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 188

KRISHAN PAHAL
Faizi Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mohammad Waseem

JUDGMENT :

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

3. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 362 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 504, 324, 506, 336 I.P.C., P.S.- Prem Nagar, District-Bareilly.

4. After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825.

5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case, a regular bail application is fil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top